-
What type of effect size is appropriate?
-
Why is the effect size of 0.4 seen as a ‘hinge point’?
-
Should we only focus on influences with high effects sizes and leave out the low ones?
-
How should research be grouped in meta-analyses?
-
Is some research just too different to robustly average?
-
Is it appropriate to rank effect sizes?
-
Are meta-analyses truly as good as the original research?
-
Is the use of effects sizes contingent on a normal distribution?
-
Explain why confidence intervals were not used to help convey the effect size information.
-
What should I keep in mind when interpreting meta-analyses?