Many of the high effects in the 2009 book e.g., student feedback, linking prior and subsequent learning, going from known to unknown are from the early 1970’s. Are we running the risk of just putting numbers to old ideas?

Modified on Mon, 14 Oct at 4:57 PM

Research is re – search; perhaps you are right it is ‘searching again’. The book Visible Learning is a literature review. From that John Hattie aimed to extrapolate a story in the hopes of forming a contribution. The interpretations of these successful ideas from the 1970’s is currently still not shared by all of our colleagues.

Was this article helpful?

That’s Great!

Thank you for your feedback

Sorry! We couldn't be helpful

Thank you for your feedback

Let us know how can we improve this article!

Select at least one of the reasons
CAPTCHA verification is required.

Feedback sent

We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article